Category: Estate Planning

Categories
Estate Administration Estate Planning Estate Tax State Tax

Making Sense of New York’s Estate Tax “Cliff”

Andrew M. Nerney —

In addition to the federal estate tax, which may be levied upon a decedent’s estate, New York imposes a separate state estate tax regime. Generally a decedent’s estate is subject to the New York State estate tax if such decedent dies a resident of New York, or if the decedent dies a non-resident but leaves behind real or tangible property physically present in the state.

Before legislation was passed in 2014, New York had a one-million-dollar exclusion amount (that is, estates would only be liable for State estate tax if the New York taxable estate was greater than one million dollars). If an estate was subject to the New York estate tax, the tax would only be charged against the portion of the estate exceeding the exclusion amount—meaning that before the new legislation went into effect, the first one million dollars was exempt of any State estate tax.

Continue reading “Making Sense of New York’s Estate Tax “Cliff””
Categories
Business Succession Estate Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax Income Tax

Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 5: Estate Planning and the M&A Process

Andrew J. Haas —

Once the business owner is ready to sell the business, there will be considerable time and energy focused on that goal. The client may engage an investment banker or business broker to assist in the sale, along with dedicated legal counsel specializing in mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) for the transaction. The business’ accountant will play an important role as will the personal financial advisers. It is possible that these roles may change from the individuals currently serving in these roles given the complexity and dollars involved, which is a natural progression during a business sale.

Continue reading “Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 5: Estate Planning and the M&A Process”
Categories
Business Succession Estate Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax Income Tax

Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 4: Document the Transfer

Andrew J. Haas —

Once a business owner has an understanding of the value of the business and the tax and cash flow impacts of the transfer, the next step is to document the transfer. This may be done by the client’s separate business legal counsel or, if there isn’t one, the estate planner can usually handle the appropriate documentation. It is important to remember that if the client’s goal is to sell to a third party, all of these documents will be reviewed and scrutinized during due diligence, so it is best practice to have them all complete and organized so there is no question about the ownership of the business and the effectiveness of any transfer.

First, all of the existing documents will need to be reviewed. For example, there may be transfer restrictions in old bylaws that will need to be amended, or there may be an existing operating agreement or shareholder agreement requiring that certain consents be obtained from the manager or board in order to transfer equity. If there are lenders or other third-party agreements in place, those should also be reviewed to ensure there are no other separate consents that need to be obtained. Those agreements may also give guidance as to how the transfer must be structured. For example, a gift to a trust for the benefit of a spouse or family members of a current equity owner may be allowed, but only if the Trustee is an individual that is qualified under the bylaws or operating agreement. The existing agreements may provide guidance as to the ultimate structure of the transfer depending on the relationship between the parties.

Continue reading “Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 4: Document the Transfer”
Categories
Business Succession Estate Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax Income Tax

Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 3: Examples of Business Transfers and Valuations

Andrew J. Haas —

The purpose of this post, part three of our “Estate Planning for the Business Owner” series, is to provide a sample using real numbers showing the impact and benefit of using closely held business interests in lifetime gifting. Assume a new business-owner client comes in and says that he or she has never had his or her business valued, but based on the earnings and the industry he or she is in, he or she is confident that a third party would buy 100 percent of the business for $100 million. Let’s further assume that the effective income tax rate on the sale of the business is 30 percent, and the client has $13 million of gift/estate tax exemption available.

Option 1: No planning

Assuming the client is able to sell the business for $100 million, and keeps the net sale proceeds at a constant value until death.

Continue reading “Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 3: Examples of Business Transfers and Valuations”
Categories
Business Succession Estate Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax Income Tax

Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 2: Valuing the Business

Andrew J. Haas —

The value of an asset at the time of a transfer is the key component to the United States’ transfer tax system. Gratuitous transfers during lifetime are considered gifts, while transfers as a result of the death of the owner are included in the value of the decedent’s estate. Some assets are easy to value: marketable securities have a value based on the mean of the high and low on the public exchange on the applicable date where they are listed, while the value of cash is equal to the total amount transferred. Valuing an interest in a closely held business is much more complex. When an estate planner has initial discussions with a client and invariably asks how much their business is worth, the client may give you a number based entirely on speculation, or perhaps they are using “book value,” a multiple of the business’ EBITDA (i.e., earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), a value used in a recent loan application, or even the value used for equity as compensation (a “409A” value). None of these values are “adequate” for purposes of determining the value of the business at the time of a transfer for estate planning purposes, and none of these “values” can be used to substantiate the value of a transfer on a Federal Gift or Estate Tax Return.

Continue reading “Estate Planning for the Business Owner Series, Part 2: Valuing the Business”
Categories
Business Succession Estate Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax Income Tax

Estate Planning for the Business Owner, Part 1: The Business Owner as a New Client

Andrew J. Haas —

For most business owners, the business is the most valuable item on their balance sheet. From an estate planning perspective, the equity in the business is also often the best asset to use for lifetime transfers to pass value (and future appreciation) out of the taxable estate. Before an estate planner can effectively provide guidance on the planning opportunities for the business, he or she will need some background information about the business. This data gathering does not need to be all-encompassing, but a good estate planner will want to know as much information about the business as possible since it is often closely intertwined with the client. Some information can be gathered through the business owner’s other professionals, such as separate business legal counsel, internal executives, accountants, and financial advisers, and it is important to have an open communication among the estate planner and these professionals as early on in the process as possible.

Continue reading “Estate Planning for the Business Owner, Part 1: The Business Owner as a New Client”
Categories
Estate Planning Estate Tax Income Tax State Tax

Understanding Residency and Domicile in Determining State Income Taxation

James R. O’Neill —

State income taxes play a prominent role in overall tax planning for individuals. A change of residence/domicile from a higher-tax state to a lower- (or no-) tax state is often considered when contemplating retirement or the receipt of significant proceeds from a business or investment transaction, or when a taxpayer realizes the amount of state income tax paid upon filing his or her return. Nine states currently have no income tax—Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming—and the rate of state income taxation varies considerably among the states.[*] A change of residence/domicile can be a practical way to decrease state personal income tax liability and preserve wealth.

Residency/domicile is a critical issue in determining state taxation. The general rule is that a state may tax the worldwide income of a person domiciled in that state. Nonresidents of a state generally only pay income tax with respect to income actually sourced from that particular state. In addition, an individual who meets the statutory test of residency in a state, typically based on presence in the state for a designated number of days, commonly 183 days, may be classified as a statutory resident and subject to tax on all of his or her income, regardless of its source. A “day” in this context typically means any part of a calendar day, except when presence in the state is solely to board a plane, ship, train, or bus for a destination outside of the state. States may provide for other exceptions to this “day” rule, including presence in the state for medical care, presence for purposes of military service, and the like.

Continue reading “Understanding Residency and Domicile in Determining State Income Taxation”
Categories
Estate Planning Estate Tax Exemption Capture Planning Generation-Skipping Transfer (“GST”) Tax Gift Tax

Don’t Wait until Next Year to Make Your Gift!

Sean R. Weissbart —

Any estate planning attorney will tell you that certain years stick out in their professional lives more than others. Here are some recent examples:

  • 2010: The year that estates of billionaires—including, most famously, New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner—were administered without paying a penny of federal estate tax.
  • 2012: The year the affluent made gifts to capture gift tax exemptions—then, at $5.12 million—before a scheduled reduction to $1 million.
  • 2020: An election year where wealthy individuals feared record-high exemptions scheduled to remain in effect for five more years might abruptly be slashed with little notice.

In the final months of these years, scores of individuals emerged hoping to take advantage of tax benefits before it became too late. To accommodate, members of the trusts and estate community worked around the clock to finalize trust agreements, engage valuation companies, and draft documents transferring stock in closely held companies to irrevocable trusts. But many clients were frustrated when they learned that optimizing these tax benefits usually requires more than writing a check and signing a trust agreement, and can take well more than a month to craft and effectuate.

We expect 2025 to be another year for the estate planning record books. Absent legislative action, the federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax exemptions—currently at $13,610,000 per individual—will be reduced by approximately one-half. Undoubtedly, scores of individuals sitting on the sidelines waiting to see if the tax laws will actually change this time, will emerge in the waning months of 2025 asking trusts and estates practitioners to help them capture these tax benefits.

Continue reading “Don’t Wait until Next Year to Make Your Gift!”
Categories
Estate Planning Gift Tax Trust Administration

Is CCA 202352018 the Death of Irrevocable Trust Decantings?

Kyle G. Durante —

For years, practitioners have freely used irrevocable trust decantings as a means to make various changes to irrevocable trusts without concern of giving rise to gift tax consequences. However, the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 202352018) (the “CCA”) may be the death to irrevocable trust decantings as we know them.

The term “irrevocable trust” is somewhat of a misnomer—there are mechanisms by which irrevocable trusts can be modified in certain respects. Generally, irrevocable trusts can be modified in one of two ways depending on applicable state law: (i) some states, such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut, permit an irrevocable trust to be modified with the consent of the beneficiaries and the trustee (some states also require the consent of the settlor if he or she is then living), which is typically referred to as a “non-judicial modification;” and (ii) some states, such as New York, Delaware, and Florida, permit an irrevocable trust to be modified by a decanting, which is a process by which an authorized trustee exercises his or her independent discretion to pay over the property of the trust to a new trust that has different terms.

For years, practitioners have been concerned that using a non-judicial modification to make certain changes with the consent of the beneficiaries (such as removing a beneficiary, shifting beneficial interests, or diluting a beneficiary’s interest), may be deemed to be a taxable gift by the beneficiaries. However, this concern was not present with respect to decantings since a decanting is effectuated by the independent act of an authorized trustee, who does not have a beneficial interest in the trust, without the consent of the beneficiaries. That was, until the CCA.

Continue reading “Is CCA 202352018 the Death of Irrevocable Trust Decantings?”
Categories
Asset Protection Estate Administration Estate Planning Family Law Matrimonial Law Spousal Rights

Confronting Cognitive Abilities in Well-Rounded Estate Planning

Alan R. Feigenbaum —

Ask anyone how they would define “trusts and estates law” and the odds are the answer will uniformly focus on the act of making the plan as to who will receive a person’s assets when he or she dies.

What happens, however, when the person who makes the so-called plan loses the cognitive ability not only to plan, but further, to carry on with the tasks of ordinary daily living. When that happens, the person we expect to be planning may be taking actions that unbeknownst to him or her are, in fact, jeopardizing the financial well-being of the estate in question and the ultimate inheritance that he or she intends for his or her loved ones to receive upon his or her death.

A recent decision from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Acting Justice Chris Ann Kelley), In the Matter of the Application of T.K., 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 50045 (Suffolk Cnty. Sup. Ct. 2024), illustrates what can happen when the person whom we expect to make the estate plan is no longer competent to protect the very assets contemplated for disposition under that plan.

Continue reading “Confronting Cognitive Abilities in Well-Rounded Estate Planning”
Exit mobile version